A selection of articles I wrote for The Age, plus some incomplete stories and, when I get around to it, a few things I think people like me will find interesting.


Tuesday, March 30, 2010

TRAVEL: Desert Storm


This travel story appeared in The Age on November 7, 1998



IT WAS a hot, hazy mid-October day when we arrived at Mutawintji National Park.


The sky was cloudless and the horizon shimmered like something out of a Coke commercial. The few tree-shaded spots in the campground were already staked out; some campsites were deserted, at others people were sprawled in the shade, sweat glistening on bare torsos. The stillness of the scene was accompanied by a soundtrack cut by local insects.


The officer at the Broken Hill National Parks and Wildlife Service had assured us that our 20-year-old Holden station wagon would handle the 130 kilometres to Mutawintji, no worries. So we had packed the HZ to the roof, hitched up the campertrailer and headed north-east.


Turning off the gravel Silver City Highway, the road had become a rough dirt affair dotted with large, sharp stones and half-buried rocks the size of watermelons. Every few kilometres the road was crossed by a watercourse that dipped deep and tested our suspension. Behind us we left a snaking trail of dust that hung in the windless air for hours, as thick as a rich, red London fog.

Mutawintji means "place of green grass and waterholes". But from our campsite we could only see spinifex and skinny trees, and the bone-dry bed of a creek close by. Moisture in this arid land was as scarce as penguins.


As we unfolded ourselves from the car, hair, clothes and mouths thick with dust, we met our first locals. A dozen prehistoric-looking apostle birds sprinted towards us; a pack of 20-centimetre velociraptors chattering to each other, chattering to us, looking for water. These drab, grey birds can fly but they prefer to walk or lope along in marauding bands, always on the move in search of food and drink.


The 70,000 hectares worth of ranges and plains of Mutawintji are the eroded remains of an ancient seabed estimated to be 400 million years old, prized by palaeontologists for its fossil content. An aerial view would show that the flaming red Bynguano Range rises from the land like a pod of enormous vermilion whales breaching the surface of some great sun-baked ocean.

At ground level, carved into the interior of the range, are beautiful river red gum-lined gorges banked by high walls of stone. Hidden in these gorges, behind boulders and beneath rock awnings, is evidence of 8000 years of occupation by the Malyankapa and Pandjikali peoples.

Rock art, old fireplaces and stone tools litter the park and can easily be found on any of its many signposted walks.


The most impressive art is at the Mutawintji Historic Site and can only be seen by joining one of the guided tours conducted twice a week from April to November. Only crazy people go to Mutawintji in summer, so no tours are offered then - and no responsibility is taken by the NPWS folk for those silly enough to venture here when daytime temperatures hardly dip below the high 30s.


On our first day, we were visited by the park's Aboriginal caretaker, Bill Riley, in his 4WD. Formerly a miner in Broken Hill, Bill's family has lived in the area for as long as anyone knows. When he became too ill to work underground he came back to Mutawintji, regained his health, and swapped the pace of city life for a new acquaintance with the land. At the time of our visit, he and wife Muriel lived in the old homestead from where they kept an eye on things, making sure no one got into - or caused - trouble.


Muriel was our guide when we took the Historic Site tour. Also from a family strongly connected to this area, but having spent most of her life in Broken Hill, Muriel had to re-learn the folklore and secrets of the land, knowledge her ancestors took for granted. As we trailed behind her through low grass and between boulders she picked out quandong berries and medicinal herbs. She also showed us remarkable rock carvings and explained the meaning of 6000-year-old ochre hand stencils on a large sandstone wall, considered one of the largest and most significant Aboriginal art collections in the country.


From a high ridge we looked down on a large flat green clearing that was a gathering place for tribes from as far away as Broken Hill, White Cliffs and Wilcannia. Typically, a messenger from the host tribe would be sent out to announce the start of initiation, rainmaking and other ceremonies and during the next few days up to 1000 people would arrive and camp on the fringes of the meeting place to exchange news, make decisions and to feast on bush fruits, emu and kangaroo.


The last such ceremonies were held as recently as 1948 and today Aboriginal people from the region use it again as a place for meetings and cultural purposes. The NPWS recognises the connection to the land of the Mutawintji Local Aboriginal Land Council and has jointly managed the park with the council since 1983. On 5 September, Mutawintji was handed back to its traditional owners, the first such handback under NSW's Aboriginal Ownership Bill (1996).


The heat was overwhelming for the first days of our visit. Bore water was available for pull-string showers in the toilet block and a tap supplied spring water, but it was warm so even drenching yourself gave little relief. That sort of heat can cause a madness in coastal dwellers not used to it. With no breeze, nothing cold to relieve the oppression of the sun as it bakes your body, inside and out, it becomes hard to think and difficult to do more than sit out the hottest part of the day. You occasionally douse yourself with tepid water in the hope that your skin won't crack and that a puff of air might come past. Every drop of moisture becomes a consideration, as the apostle birds made clear when they leapt with alacrity and much chatter on to a puddle I left behind a tree.


Fortunately, Muriel told us about the Homestead Gorge Trail, a four-kilometre walk leading to a swimming hole. Early on the third morning of our stay we packed food, water and bathers, donned our flyveils, and set out.


We followed a single-file track for several kilometres through a wide grassed area between two ridges until it entered a narrow gorge. We'd seen magnificent wedge-tailed eagles circling above the plain, as well as corellas, magpies and a rare peregrine falcon. Emus and kangaroos watched our progress as a herd of feral goats - a real problem in the park - chewed on tussocks in the foothills, doing their best to ignore us.


Red markers helped us tread the best route, but once in the gorge, there was only one way to go: deeper in. We clambered over rocks and frequently had to criss-cross a dry creek bed. We'd started in the cooler early morning but now the sun was high enough to blaze into the gorge, making it very tough going.The reward was worth it. After an hour-and-a-half, we reached a dark, deep, inviting rock pool bounded on three sides by sandstone walls perhaps 40 metres high, a small sandy beach with gum trees on the fourth.


The water was icy - not cold, icy - and our first dives brought screams that bounced off the rocks. The water gradually reversed the melting process our internal organs had suffered during two-and-a-half days of ridiculous heat and we felt human again. We spent the best part of the day at the pool, eating, drinking, lying around, jumping in whenever we'd been dry for more than 15 minutes.


We only had to share the water with a couple of dozen frogs that lived in rockholes at the water's edge. At the back of the pool was a metre-wide gap in the rock that opened into a cavern with a slim shaft of light entering from above, and beyond that was another cavern. In here, the air was dank, the frogs were fewer and of a darker greenish-brown. It felt eerie and we were reluctant to explore any deeper into the heart of the gorge.


On the morning of the fourth day, we awoke to an unusual sight: clouds. And not the pure white cotton wool variety; these had a dark grey underside as though they'd been belly-sliding through mud and seemed to be weighed down, like a pregnant cow. Through the day we kept an eye on them as they grew fatter and darker until the whole sky was like charcoal, so low it felt that you could hit it with a decent throw of a rock. It was still hot but now a mad wind leapt up and buffeted our tent, tearing pegs from the ground and flapping guy ropes against the canvas. A tree full of corellas screeched in full voice and it was all the apostle birds could do to keep their feet.


It was mid afternoon but there was less light than on a half-moon evening. Bill arrived to tell us a desert storm was heading towards Broken Hill and might throw its weight against us on its way through. He gave us a choice: pack up now and get out before the road turned to mud, or batten down and ride out whatever was on its way. If it rained hard, he said, the now-dry creek would swell and flood the camping area and we'd have to move to higher ground near the homestead. We'd also need at least four days' food because that's how long it takes for the road to dry out after a storm like this one, even in Mutawintji's heat.


We took the gamble and stayed. Other campers bundled their gear together and left as we hammered extra pegs into the ground to prevent the trailer from being blown to Kansas. For an hour, we sat in the campertrailer hoping the canvas would hold. Then raindrops the size of eyeballs began to explode in the dirt around us. For days, we had prayed for relief from the heat, for a breeze and perhaps a cold shower. This was how the weather gods answered us. It seemed a folly to have asked anything of them.


But the rain didn't come. The wind pushed the storm to the southwest and we saw the trailing edge of an enormous black cloud bank speed away, leaving a calm, blue-skied late afternoon in its wake. We'd escaped the storm but Broken Hill copped a lashing as it flexed its tail on the way to Adelaide where the real damage was done.


We left the following day, chastened by the elements and full of respect for its extremes. To live in a land so harsh and so threatening requires a certain spirit and special skills: the next time we go to Mutawintji, we're taking a refrigerator. One that makes ice.


Saturday, March 20, 2010

Use it or lose it, apps to save your sanity

This article first appeared in The Age on November 10, 2009

Go to original article


FIRST comes the realisation that it is missing. Then come disbelief, nausea, fury - with yourself - and grief. Unlike the other stages of grieving after a death, there is no acceptance.

These are the five stages of iPhone loss.


Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Operation STOP-SNORE (includes a good joke)

Several years ago I let a surgeon stick a scalpel down my throat in the hope that he could cure my snoring. This is an account of the operation and its aftermath that I sent out to friends at the time.

When the surgeon contacted me six months after the operation to gauge its success I told him that I was not snoring any more.

Had he contacted me a week later my answer would have been different. Six years later I still spend most of my nights sleeping on a lumpy lounge.


FOR those who inquired about how I’ve been since the operation ‑ and for those who don’t know I had an operation ‑ I offer this as a kind of FAQ. (A small warning: much of the following is not for the easily-queased or those with the usual boundaries of good taste.)

An email to Tony Martin

Tony Martin is not an easy man to contact. Word is he has no mobile phone, doesn't use an answering machine and only when he has reason to front the media to promote his latest hilarious book does he become slightly easier to reach.

I managed to track down an email address I was assured was Mr Martin's -- even though the name on it was Les SurnamebeginningwithN. I sent the email below to the address on March 4 and am yet to receive a reply.

Perhaps Mr Martin thinks I'm a potential stalker. Perhaps he doesn't want to confirm that he is Les SurnamebeginningwithN. Perhaps he thinks I'm a wanker.

Perhaps all of the above.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

At what point does internet filtering become censorship?

The article first appeared in The Age on December 16, 2009
Go to original article


THE twitterverse was predictably scathing.

One tweeter going by the handle "incorrect" wrote "This moronic filtering proposed by Conroy should be referred to as 'the old Chinese remedy"'. drunkenkoala tweeted that "for a democratic country this sure does seem like china or iran". asphotos blasted "Chairman rudd you communist" while om-henners mused "I have to wonder whether Stephen Conroy read 1984 and thought 'I could totally do that"'.

sunlightandsnow pointed out that "there's definitely some stuff that could be classified as violent porn, lots of rapes etc in the Bible ..."

This response to the the Australian Government's announcement yesterday confirming plans to implement mandatory filtering by internet service providers (ISPs) of certain categories of online material does not suggest that the twitterati are pro-child pornography, partial to incest and bestiality, or keen to incite violence. It does suggest that many people think it is important to fight for openness and the free exchange of ideas, qualities fundamental to the internet.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Twitter gives Rudd a taste of real time democracy

This article first appeared in The Age on February 10, 2010
Go to original web page


It was a perfect example of the social web in action: as the Prime Minister fielded questions from 200 young Australians on the ABC's live Q&A program on Monday night, his performance was being critiqued in real time by a horde of viewers using Twitter.

Not all the comments were polite. Or politically informed. Or always relevant to the issue at hand. But democratic discourse is never all of those things all of the time - no matter what the vehicle - so you might say the Twitter conversation was typical of something you'd find anywhere issues are being discussed by a cross-section of the electorate.

Twitter isn't about to fall off its perch

Published in The Age February 9, 2010
Go to the original article


HANDS up if you have a Twitter account but rarely use it. Or don't use it at all. Congratulations, you're part of the significant percentage of the 75 million people who have signed up for the service but barely give it a passing thought.

Roughly two-fifths of Twitter accounts have never sent a tweet, according to analysis by RJ Metrics, and a quarter of those signed up have no followers. Further, 80 per cent of all Twitter users have tweeted fewer than 10 times and only 17 per cent - not quite one-fifth - tweeted in December.

Seen in isolation, these are sobering numbers for fans of the micro-blogging platform. But numbers can be misleading. In fact, this decline is good news indeed.

Twitter searches for golden thread

The Interview
BIZ STONE


Biz Stone believes he has found a way to transform the micro-blogging service into a money-spinner

ITS critics complain about the inanity of its content, its demanding nature, its ability to suck time, effort and attention from already busy lives, 140 characters at a time.

But such criticisms are minor compared with the biggest question facing the micro-blogging service Twitter: can it make any money?

Biz Stone, the California-based co-founder of the increasingly popular service, acknowledges the challenge. But, he assures anyone who asks, they're working on the problem and they're confident they have a solution.

Stone is keen to explain what Twitter is really about; to define its true value and assure users, companies and investors that building an invaluable real-time search service from which a revenue model will inevitably follow is the best strategy.

He acknowledges that in its early days Twitter had a fun and casual tone, reflected in the home-page invitation to users — "What are you doing?" — to share their lives with the world.

"When we started out we thought we just had this fun service," says Stone. "And that's why the early critics said of Twitter: it's not useful."

Stone and his co-creators saw the early incarnation of Twitter as a rudimentary networking service, something you would use to stay in close contact with loved ones or friends. But, he says, the open nature of the network — the ability to follow other people's messages without an existing personal connection — made it different to other social networks.

The founders' own perception of Twitter as purely fun and casual changed as people started to use it in new ways: to organise protests in Iran after a contested election result; to tweet (including photo) about a bridge that had snapped a cable in San Francisco; and to report — before any other media could break the news — that an aircraft had crashed into the Hudson River.

"When we saw it used during emergencies or political insurrection, or even used to enliven live events, we knew it was something bigger, something truly useful," says Stone.

Gone is the fun-and-casual tag, Stone now defines Twitter as an information network for discovering and sharing information about current events. "There's this real-time element to it and the information is very short and quick. If you want to find out what's happening right now you turn to Twitter. Or if you want to report something that you've just seen that is in some way interesting, or you feel that you have to share it — say you've just witnessed an accident — you blurt it out in Twitter.

"We have millions of people around the world reporting on what's going on [around them]. It's a very powerful discovery and search engine for what is happening at any given time."

This evolution from fun to informative is reflected in Twitter's new invitation to users. In November, "What are you doing?" was replaced by "What's happening?"

Being fun — even useful — is not a business model. Not on its own. Twitter can have millions of users — a recent estimate suggested as many as 75 million people have signed up to the service — but without revenue streams such size becomes a drain on resources, even a threat to survival.

Stone several times mentions making Twitter "more relevant and adding value". There's a hint in this mantra of the company's revenue strategy.

"There's all this information in Twitter, right now, that's relevant to you at this point in time and at the location you're currently in. What we need to do is find a way to get that information out of Twitter and into the palm of your hand in a timely fashion. That's the challenge that lies ahead for us."

In fact, Twitter has considerable financial breathing space. Deals with Google and Bing, Microsoft's search service, to pay for real-time access to tweets were reportedly worth $US25 million, making the company profitable for the first time in its less than four-year existence.
The company also recently raised about $US100 million in venture capital to go with $US60 million raised in an earlier round. This suggests a confidence that Stone and co will find a way to turn tweets into gold.

The Google and Bing deals point to the growing importance to the internet of real-time search.
People increasingly turn to the internet for instant information about restaurants, films, Christmas sales, traffic, weather and news updates. That's where Twitter is convinced it will find gold.

But amid talk of revenue and investment, Stone stresses that Twitter serves a higher purpose, that he and co-founder Evan Williams see their creation as being part of a "bigger mission".
That mission, says Stone, is the belief that the open exchange of information can have a positive global impact.

"We've seen the powerful impact that can have, and especially with Twitter, we've seen the good that it can do around the world. So there's a bigger mission in creating these kinds of online communication systems.

"On top of that," says Stone, "we think that these kinds of systems can be very profitable."
Twitter's critics will believe that when they see it.

The hard questions

1 Is there a danger Twitter could be replaced by a competitor before investors see any return on their money? "Our investors know our plan and they're on board with us taking our time and getting it right. They knew who they were investing in and what they were getting into and approximately what the timetable was. There is no pressure from our investors or our board."

2 Were you ever tempted to sell Twitter to Google or Microsoft?
"We had an attractive and useful service, we had enormous growth and people around the world flocking to the service but we had not made a business out of it, so we had only really done half the job. Because we have this philosophy about how we can do good and make a profit, we felt strongly that we wanted to complete the picture and fulfil the business part. We feel that if we can get that done, it's something we really want to do."

3 If you were starting Twitter now, what would you do differently?
"In the early days we offered Twitter over SMS for free and we paid for them. As Twitter grew so did the SMS bill and we had to turn it off. It's not great when you offer a service and then take it away. What we could have done was a better job of arranging for that service."

4 Is Twitter an expensive operation to run?
"It is and it isn't. It depends on what you compare us with. We're not surveying millions of hours of video, like YouTube, but we are processing 50 million tweets a day. It's not as expensive as some, but it's more expensive than running a bookshop."

CV
CHRISTOPHER ISAAC ‘‘BIZ’’ STONE
■ Co-founder and creative director of Twitter
■ Raised in Wellesley, Massachusetts
■ Author of Blogging: Genius Strategies for Instant Web Content (2002)
EDUCATION
■ Northeastern University and the University of Massachusetts, Boston
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
■ Designer at Little, Brown and Co
■ 2003-2005 Senior specialist at Google
■ Co-created social media services Blogger, Xanga and Odeo
■ 2006 Co-founded Twitter with Evan Williams and Jack Dorsey as a side project that turned into an internet phenomenon


Published in The Age, February 25, 2010
Go to original web page

The write stuff - the ABC of news

Retooling media empires is ferociously competitive, even without the ABC.

ANNABEL Crabb is a terrific journalist. The former Fairfax reporter has a great nose for a political story and an engaging style that has won her many fans. Love her work.

So it isn't surprising that the ABC wanted her to join its stable of journalists, which she did in early December.

What catches the eye is what she's doing there.

Crabb is described on Aunty's website and by radio hosts as the ABC's "chief online political writer". Not "reporter", not "correspondent", not even the generic "journalist". Writer.

Other than a few special-interest exceptions — I'm thinking Gardening Australia and the now-defunct program guide 24 Hours and Sport Monthly magazines — the ABC has been in the business of radio and television.

Indeed, the government's australia.gov.au website describes the ABC's function as being to provide radio and television services within Australia and overseas.

But with the launch of its online journalism site The Drum — edited by another former Fairfax luminary (more recently of Crikey.com), Jonathan Green and for which Crabb writes — the ABC has staked out some new turf.

It's easy for a print journalist to feel miffed by this. Newspapers have a hard enough time surviving without competition in their traditional patch from a media juggernaut such as the ABC.

The Drum is sure to eat into the print media's following.

But see what Fairfax Media (owner of The Age) is doing: audio clips from Fairfax Radio interviews are regularly posted on our news sites; and Fairfax sites increasingly produce and use video to cover everything from news to the arts, sport, sex and economics.

A deal with Channel Ten, reported last week as being the subject of talks, would boost the amount and range of content available for Fairfax to post online.

These are the trends of the digital revolution in which media platforms are converging, the means of dissemination are broadening and the audience for their content is splintering.

A report conducted by the non-profit Pew Internet & American Life Project, released this month, draws a telling picture of how Americans' news habits are changing.

Among the report's more interesting numbers: 61 per cent of Americans consume news online — more than radio (54 per cent) or television (50 per cent); 92 per cent get news from multiple platforms; 75 per cent get news by email or from social networking sites; 51 per cent of social networking users get news items from people they follow, while 23 per cent of this group follow news organisations or individual journalists.

A third of mobile phone users get news on phones.

Given that Australians' use of social media is the highest in the world (according to Nielsen), we would expect figures for Australia to indicate similar behaviour patterns and at least as much penetration of new media platforms.

Negotiating the tumultuous transition to the digital landscape is not a cheap exercise and commercial operations are at a disadvantage when competing in the same market as the publicly funded ABC.

Add the loss of classified advertising revenue to the web and the task of retooling media empires in a fast-changing digital world becomes even more challenging.

Some radical thoughts are being thunk. Some bright spark last year worked out that if The New York Times ceased its print edition and instead gave subscribers a Kindle to read the paper each day, the newspaper would end up ahead.

I'm not sure whether that's a disturbing or inspiring thought.

Either way, it's not something that should bother anyone at the ABC.


Published in The Age, March 9, 2010

Go to the original web page

Individuality lost in a web of advertising

This article first appeared in The Age, February 16, 2010
Go to original web page



Follow the money and you'll end up at the ads

IS ADVERTISING the financial enabler of the internet or the ultimate debaser of its potential? Is it the web's vital creative engine room or a usurping beast that demands that all other content and activity be without value? Would we all be happier if the internet were ad-free?

These questions are suggested by a couple of articles that popped up during the past week. The first was an interview in The Independent with author Jaron Lanier.

Lanier argues that social media — the Facebooks, LinkedIns, MySpaces and so on through which people increasingly connect — commoditise relationships and debase knowledge by requiring people to define themselves with the scantest of information. "Individual reductionism", he calls it.

He says the collective thinking that arises from social media relationships, known as the "hive mind", is regarded by the market as a kind of superhuman intelligence, greater and more valuable than individual intelligence. In the process, says Lanier, the individual disappears, their effort is devalued and people become mere receptacles for advertising — the only online content with hard commercial value.

Lanier speaks like a dreadlock-wearing hippie iconoclast — which he is — so his cynicism is not surprising. But he is also a computer scientist, a pioneer of virtual reality and the author of the recently released You Are Not a Gadget.

In his book, Lanier takes particular aim at advertising. He argues that to understand what is going on in a society or ideology you have to "follow the money". "If money is flowing to advertising instead of to musicians, journalists and artists," he writes, "then a society is more concerned with manipulation than with truth or beauty."

The combination of the hive mind and advertising has resulted in a new kind of social contract in which "authors, journalists, musicians and artists are encouraged to treat the fruits of their intellects and imaginations as fragments to be given away without pay to the hive mind".

Advertising, curiously, is untouched by this effect."

At the end of the rainbow of (social media's) open culture," Lanier writes, "lies an eternal spring of advertisements. Advertising is elevated by open culture from its previous role as an accelerant and placed at the centre of the human universe."

Advertising is singled out as the only form of expression meriting genuine commercial protection in the new world to come. Any other form of expression is to be remashed, anonymised and decontextualised to the point of meaninglessness."

Now add to Lanier's tough talk a paper titled "The Advertising Effect", released yesterday by Compass, a British political pressure group.

According to the authors, the purpose of advertising — here I'm paraphrasing Jackie Ashley, who wrote about the paper in The Guardian on the weekend — is not to make people feel happy or fulfilled but to make them feel needy: "The creation of a mood of restless dissatisfaction with what we have got and who we are so that we go out and buy more."

The paper goes on to suggest banning all advertising in public places — to which Lanier would no doubt add the internet.It is true that advertising is pervasive. It does its best to saturate whatever media it travels in, fingering every crevice looking for eyeballs, potential customers, more undiscovered markets to sacrifice to the god called "Economic Growth".

Would banning advertising from the internet make us feel happier?

The kingdom of Bhutan, nestled between India and China, is famous for having the highest level of gross national happiness in the world. It also has one of the world's lowest levels of internet penetration: just 5.8 per cent of the population is connected.

I'm just saying.

A sympathy for the whales

This is an incomplete story. If there is enough interest, I will finish it.
The punchline of the completed piece will be: "Damn you, Greenpeace!"
Please vote Yes or No via email (grdn19@gmail.com) or via Twitter (#damnyougreenpeace)



A BATTERED green pick-up bumps along a deserted Ohio back road. Plumes of orange dust rise like monstrous rooster plumes each time it strays off the blacktop and fish-tails back on again. It has a gate-scratch down one side, smashed tail-lights and a buckled fender where it hit a 300lb hog on a rainy night in a cow paddock. Took some fancy driving that did, to hit that pig.

At the wheel of the pick-up is Dwayne. Dwayne is one of 14 children, and even though he's three months off his 19th birthday he has seven kids of his own. Some of them to the same mother.

He hunches over the steering wheel, chubby hands clutching it hard as he thinks of Emmy-Lou-May back home. Emmy-Lou-May is the mother of his two youngest and the woman he truly loves. At the moment. Dwayne is thinking about the grits and greens Emmy-Lou-May has waiting for him. His ample stomach, barely contained by his denim britches, rumbles under the V8 grunt of the pick-up.

It's sunset, and as Dwayne drives west the blazing ball is low in his eyes and he squints hard to see the road. That's why -- on account of the low sun in his eyes -- Dwayne doesn't see the spaceship hovering at tree-height 200 yards ahead. And that's why -- on account of his rumbling ample stomach and the grunting V8 -- he doesn't hear it as it hums menacingly upon his approach.